Satcom Frontier

Understanding Acquisition Perspectives Vital for Hosted Payloads

October 5, 2011

Recently I had the opportunity to be a panelist at an event put on by the Air Force’s Space and Missile Systems Center (SMC). The event brought together members of the private sector Hosted Payload Alliance (HPA) and SMC’s Hosted Payload Office (HPO). It was a highly productive session, and a great example of collaborative public/private dialogue.

The excellent keynote address really set the tone of the event, given by SMC director Doug Loverro. He laid out the three main reasons that hosted payloads have an important role to play in supporting the mission of the SMC. Those three are:

  • Affordability
  • Resiliency
  • Distribution

I had the privilege of serving on the Procurement Practices, Acquisition Models and Contracting Guidelines panel. We discussed issues such as FAR Part 12 and 15, the differences in contracting procedures based on who is the prime, and how to address the fact that the commercial sector and the government have historically contracted for satcom in different ways.

Government often works through a big systems integrator, has a long timeline and is used to making satellite design or network changes along the way. The commercial sector typically operates more directly with both the customer and the satellite manufacturer, working on a shorter timeline with few design or operational changes.

I came away from my panel convinced that both commercial and the government organizations can gain greatly through some empathy for the other’s perspective. An open and honest discourse at the beginning of the relationship around contractual obligations and risk sharing is much more constructive when you understand where the other side is coming from and how they are accustomed to acquiring satcom.

More broadly, I also believe that as much as we all would like to standardize the hosted payload model, each situation is different. Hosted payloads defy a cookie-cutter approach. There are too many variables -- such as the size and weight of the payload and how specialized the type of mission is -- to generalize about when a hosted payload is the right approach.

One promising idea that was raised during the event was to encourage internships and advisory positions for SMC staff inside commercial companies. This sort of cross-pollination can only strengthen the type of collaboration that is vital to making hosted payloads successful. It’s a good example of the “outside the box” thinking events like this engender, and that can foster a strong public/private partnership in space.  

 






Comments

At the recent Hosted Payload

At the recent Hosted Payload Summit in Washington D.C., I heard Doug Loverro reiterate many of the positive points made at the initial meeting discussed above. In fact, the entire team of the newly formed Hosted Payload Office at SMC was in attendance which shows the dedication of the SMC in making hosted payloads part of the planning process. Additionally, Col Beidleman, Director, Development Planning Directorate, SMC/XR noted that hosted payloads are now included at the beginning of each planning cycle . This is a big step in the right direction. To paraphrase Mr. Loverro, "UAVs weren't even considered useful at the beginning of the Gulf War; now, the military can't live without them.". Hopefully hosted payloads will enjoy that same success.

Post new comment

(If you're a human, don't change the following field)
Your first name.
(If you're a human, don't change the following field)
Your first name.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.